Wednesday, May 7, 2008

The Answer Is a Firm and Loving "No"

"Are the Quakers Going Pagan?" It's not only a question but the name of an article by Matthew Streib of the Religion News Service. The article was picked up by Christianity Today. Streib describes paganism within Quakerism as a growing trend, numbering some several hundred. The subtitle of Streib's article reveals its substance: "The liberal end of the Society of Friends has long had members who denied God's existence or Jesus' divinity. Now hundreds of pagans call Quakerism home." This may be a somewhat new phenomenon to Streib, but it's not to Evangelical Friends.

So how do I answer Streib's question? As Evangelical Quakers in Evangelical Friends Church Southwest, the answer is a firm and loving "No".

When I became a pastor in what was then Friends Church Southwest Yearly Meeting, our Yearly Meeting was in the middle of a theological tempest about this and other subjects within the wider world of Friends (at that time FCSYM was part of Friends United Meeting, and this issue hastened the departure of FCSYM from FUM and into accountability with Evangelical Friends International).

At our Midyear Conference in January, 1992, we approved the following (the minute also deals with homosexual practice):

We, Friends Church Southwest Yearly Meeting, believe that our only true identity as Friends is found in Jesus Christ, who is the only way to salvation and fellowship with God. We as Friends also believe that the Holy Spirit inspired the Scriptures. Since His present leadings never contradict the Scriptures, they are our authority and standard for our faith, practice, and the moral principles which are to regulate our actions. In short, the only way to real unity among Friends is through obedience to our Lord Jesus Christ and the Scriptures. Unfortunately, these affirmations are not shared by all who call themselves Friends, and within these groups, there has been a growing tolerance and even encouragement of behaviors and beliefs which are plainly unchristian and not in keeping with clear biblical teachings.

There are two particular issues which have occasioned this minute: the affirmation and encouragement of non-Christian religious beliefs and practices; and the affirmation and encouragement of homosexual and extramarital sexual activity. We realize that these are not the only sins being committed by Friends. However, these unchristian and sinful practices are being publicly endorsed and encouraged by different groups calling themselves Friends. We recognize that some Friends have addressed these issues, but lest there be any doubt or confusion concerning our views on these practices, we make this declaration.

We declare that our Lord Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation and fellowship with God. We reject and utterly oppose all forms of idolatry, which is the worship, religious service, or invocation of any being other than the one true God who is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. To our sorrow, we find idolatry revived and encouraged today under various names, including goddess worship, "New Age" practices, Wicca and neo-paganism. We reject and disown all non-Christian practices, and spiritualities as contrary to true Christianity. We urge everyone, and particularly any who profess the name of Friends, to avoid with absolute vigilance any form of idolatry, no matter who subtle or innocent it may be made to appear.

We declare that our sexuality is God's gift, and that sexual intercourse is to be enjoyed, as the Scriptures teach, only within the marriage of one man and one woman. We reject and utterly oppose homosexual activity, especially the "blessing" of same sex unions, as sinful and displeasing to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Right reason, Holy Scripture and the Spirit of Christ within us unitedly testify that homosexual practice is contrary to God's will. We also observe that homosexual practice is portrayed in the Scriptures as one of the awful consequences of humanity's pursuit of idolatry. (Romans 1:18-32)

We want to be clear that we welcome those who struggle with homosexual temptation. The gospel of Jesus welcomes all who turn to Him in the hope of a new and remade life. Our Lord Jesus offers that power for real change. We must also be equally clear, however, that we cannot welcome or tolerate the teaching that homosexual or extramarital sexual activity is acceptable to Friends. Without hate or fear we must reject these behaviors because they are both sinful and displeasing to our Lord, and because they are ultimately hurtful and destructive to those who participate in them.

This minute is not meant to strike out in anger at those caught in the web of homosexuality or of non-Christian beliefs. We are angered, however, by the fact that some Friends organizations not only fail to give a clear witness to the gospel in the face of these false beliefs, but actually encourage people to approve and explore these dangerous and destructive paths.

It is our hope that this minute will not be heard merely as a word of condemnation, but also as an invitation to all who call themselves Friends to the truth and life which is found only in our Lord Jesus Christ. While we reject these sins, we humbly acknowledge that we fall short in many ways and invite the Holy Spirit to bring our sins to the light of Christ. Our desire is to repent of them and renounce them as well.

We earnestly pray for the guidance of our Lord Jesus for the future of Friends.

Approved by Friends Church Southwest Yearly Meeting in session at Midyear Conference, 1/24/92

(Source: For convenience I copied and pasted from an original post to Quaker-L by Daniel Chase. "A Minute of Declaration" can be found in Official Minutes: Friends Church Southwest Yearly Meeting, 1992.)

Read the Faith and Practice of Evangelical Friends Church Southwest by clicking here.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

"Since His present leadings never contradict the Scriptures, they are our authority and standard for our faith, practice, and the moral principles which are to regulate our actions."

Of course as any good student of the Bible knows, Dear Friends, the Scriptures contradict the Scriptures, over and over again. Hence the danger in taking the Bible literally, rather than "in the Spirit in which it was given".

In God's Love and Care, Eric Evans

Anonymous said...

Because of unchristian practices of many liberal Quakers do you think
using the word Friend or Quaker in your Church title can become a
stumbling block for evangelism?
My experience is when most folks think of Quakers today it the
liberal Quakers that come to mind.
Not the evangelical Quakers.
Why is this?
John

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

Hello Eric and John--

Thanks to both of you for commenting on my post.

Eric, I take your point that there are problematic passages in the scriptures. To my mind this doesn't negate the whole. In fact it can provide the necessary tools for a full understanding of troublesome issues. I come from the viewpoint that the best commentary on the scriptures is the scripture itself. For instance, some take Paul's admonitions against women speaking or teaching as the end of the story. The whole story is that Paul promoted women in ministry, as do other bible writers. This then informs and moderates my understanding of Paul's prohibitions. So the scripture speaks to itself and informs us of the full story. I don't know if you caught it but I posted on what I think is a careful, thoughtful use of the scriptures. You can read it at the link below (if this comment will let you link there) or you can read my post earlier this month titled "Taken Out of Context?".

http://glendorafriendschurch.blogspot.com/2008/05/taken-out-of-context.html


John, as for being an evangelical Friend who gets painted undeservedly with the broad brush the media uses for liberal Quakers (even though the majority of Friends in the U.S. and around the world are more evangelical than not), I have come to a point of comfort and confirmation that being a Friend who is evangelical is right and good, and can actually be a tool for evangelism. Quakers have a good reputation in the minds of many people, and this can be used to our advantage to point people to saving relationship with Jesus Christ. I posted on this issue in October 2007, titled "Quaker Evangelism." Maybe you can link to it below.

http://glendorafriendschurch.blogspot.com/search?q=quaker+evangelism

Anna said...

Thank you Friends for writing and posting this in Faith. As a queer, Christian and Friend I do not nor can not agree with a large part of this article but I do thank you for posting it. This is the first article I have read on the subject in a while that has felt truly faithful to God to the best of your ability. Although I grieve for our differences I do thank you for your faithfulness to the Spirit and to God. Christ bless you and your Meeting.

Peace and Joy,
Anna.

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

Thank you, Anna, for your gracious comment.

QiN-Hombre said...

I proposed an outdoor Quaker Meeting in New York City in a public park near the former WTC as an outreach, or evangelical initiative in addition to the fact that I felt it was something that would help Friends get over 9/11.

I was almost not nominated to the committee to oversee the allowed Meeting once it was formally recognized by the New York Quarterly Meeting. The other committee members (I also was on the nominating committee) said I had too much personally invested in the new Meeting. I went along with the committee when, due to construction in our first place of worship, we had to find a new location and when the other Friends on the committee wanted very badly to meet next to a labyrinth in a different park nearby. Do you feel this strong affinity for worshiping near a labyrinth is paganistic? You can see pictures:
http://downtownmeeting.org
Glenn

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

Glenn--

Thanks for your comment. I don't preseume to be able to answer your question, not knowing the full story. There's probably not a good black and white answer. Through the centuries Chrisitans have sometimes used the labyrinth as a contemplative prayer tool. I'm not sure of its origin, but Christians have been known to appropriate and try to redeem pagan symbols. I think the issue for EFCSW is the embrace and use of paganism in worship of Christ Jesus.

Thanks again for the comment.

Anonymous said...

Friend Anna speaks my mind. I am a Quaker who happens to be gay and very much a follower of Jesus Christ. Sadly, gay people in the Society are painted with a broad brush.

Not all of us are liberal Friends. I am a member of a Conservative Meeting. And while I do not agree on your YM's statement on homosexuality, I do applaud your stand for a Christ-centered faith.

In the Light of Jesus,
Craig
Friendship MM
Greensboro, NC

David Carl said...

Greetings Bruce,

I have gay friends who have a long-standing and committed relationship. One of them is very ill, and her partner is lovingly and devotedly caring for her. Can you please explain how this displeases God and how it may be "dangerous and destructive?"

In Friendship,

David Carl

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

Craig--

I thank you for your comment. What do you think about Friends and paganism?

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

David--

Thank you for your comment.

God loves all people and so do I.

This is a bold statement considering that all people have sinned and fallen short of God's glory. But God's grace has lifted me up in spite of my sin, my personal rebellion against God which ultimately seeks to destroy me. More than that, His grace helps me choose His will and ways. I now try to live beyond my sin in total dependence upon Him. It's not always easy, and sometimes I stumble, but the Lord helps me along the way and covers over my shortcomings.

Sin, any sin, is always destructive; gluttony, murder, anger, rape, etc. are sinful acts that hurt in the moment and for eternity. "A Minute of Declaration" pointed to particular sins addressed by the Friends Church Southwest in 1992. Humility in the face of our own sinfulness and brokeness leads us to carefully consider that God loves sinful people and strives for their best.

David Carl said...

Bruce,

That was something of a non-answer to my question, though admittedly the question was a bit loaded. I take it you wouldn't find anything sinful about someone taking care of an ill person of the same gender. On the other hand, perhaps God brought these two together in this way in order to provide the loving care that might not otherwise have been available.

But what is it you do find sinful in homosexual relationships -- is it specifically acts of sex between the partners, or merely the fact that they abide together in a loving relationship? I'm genuinely curious, as I cannot see any destructiveness in two people loving and caring for one another.

I also wonder if you have seen the film, "For the Bible Tells Me So," about the harm that anti-homosexual preaching has caused young gay church members and their families, and the possibility of reading scripture differently. If you haven't seen it, I'd highly recommend it. Whether you ultimately agree with its conclusion or not, its certainly germane to this topic.

In Friendship,

David

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

David--

Thanks for your follow up. I apologize if it appeared that my response didn't directly answer your question about your friends. I wanted to stick to the issue, particularly since I don't know those whom you talk about.

I hope my implication was clear that homosexual sin, like all other sin, is ultimately destructive. Additionally, sinners can be and perhaps usually are happy, committed (to something, at least), loving people. But being a loving person does not reduce or do away with our sinfulness.

Regarding homosexual sin, my reading of scripture is traditional. I am aware of ways to exegete the scriptures which prohibit homosexual practice, ways which explain that the authors weren't addressing adult, consentual relationships, but abusive relationships only. My reading of scripture leads me to believe that homosexual practice is what's being addressed as being contrary to God's will and ways for His people.

As for contemporary social implications, I have not seen the documentary you mention, but am aware of the supreme hurt the church often inflicts upon homosexual people. Therein lies the great problem--how to talk about this subject without hurting people. My position (and I speak for myself here, not EFCSW) is that when confronted with changes in social norms, changes that would redefine traditional insitutions that I view as good and right, then I will address them in careful, thoughtful ways, ways that hopefully won't intentionally hurt others. That is, in part, why I did not address your friends. That is why I also appreciate your careful tone with me.

Sandra said...

Setting aside the entire issue of Christ-centered faith, and homosexuality, as each are large separate issues meriting their own discussion, I still felt compelled to respond to what I read here.

I am a convinced Quaker of some years and a member of a monthly meeting. I was a regular attender to a monthly meeting in New York Yearly Meeting before I moved back to California and eventually joined a Meeting that is part of Pacific Yearly Meeting. I mention this to show that I have spent years in unprogrammed meetings both on the East Coast and West Coast and never have I heard or read within these circles anything which either affirmed or encouraged extramarital sexual activity, and certainly no teachings on this. I was flabbergasted at reading this and have to wonder what is/are the source(s) you/Southwest Yearly Meeting have used to base this astounding statement. Please explain.

Pastor Bruce Butler said...

Hi Sandra--

I'll try to answer what I think you are asking and you can clarify if I hit the mark.

Within the Friends world are all kinds of expressions of Quakerism, some of which, like the Christianity Today article on Quaker paganism addresses, are clearly not Christian. Additionally there are many Quakers who affirm homosexual activity as a good thing, something that evangelical Friends contest on biblical grounds. This was true in the early 1990s when our Yearly Meeting first addressed this issue, hoping to speak to other Friends and clarify our own positions, and it remains true today. I can't account for your lack of encountering the issues involved but they are out there nonetheless. I suggest doing a quick google search for Quaker blogs to see that this is so.

I hope this helps.

uiyui said...

However mean your gold in wow life is,buy wow gold meet it and live it ;wow gold cheap do not shun it and call it hard names.It is not so bad as you are.It looks poorest when you are richest.The fault-finder will find faults in paradise.wow gold kaufen love your life,poor as it is.maple meso You may perhaps have some pleasant,thrilling,maplestory power leveling glorious hourss,even in a poor-house.The setting sun is reflected from the windows of the alms-house as brightly as from the rich man's abode;the snow melts before its door as early in the spring.sell wow gold I do not see but a quiet mind may live as contentedly there,cheap mesos and have as cheering thoughts,as in a palace.The town's poor seem to me often to live the most independent lives of any.May be they are simply great enough to billig wow gold receive without misgiving.Most think that they are above being supported by the town;powerlevel but it often happens that buy maplestory mesos they are not above supporting themselves by dishonest means.which should be more disreputable.Cultivate poverty like a garden herb,like sage.Do not trouble wow powerleveln yourself much to get new things,maple mesos whether clothes or friends